Difference between revisions of "8.1 The Direction of the Curriculum"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with 'Image:lighterstill.jpgright|frame Knowledge is not the motivation for learning this course. Peace is. This is the prerequisite for knowledge only bec...')
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Image:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Acim_small.jpg|right|frame]]
 
[[Image:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Acim_small.jpg|right|frame]]
  
Knowledge is not the motivation for learning this course. Peace is. This is the prerequisite for knowledge only because those who are in conflict are not peaceful, and peace is the condition of knowledge because it is the condition of the Kingdom. Knowledge can be restored only when you meet its conditions. This is not a bargain made by God, Who makes no bargains. It is merely the result of your misuse of his laws on behalf of an imaginary will that is not his. Knowledge is his will. If you are opposing his will, how can you have knowledge? I have told you what knowledge offers you, but perhaps you do not yet regard this as wholly desirable. If you did you would not be so ready to throw it away when the ego asks for your allegiance.
+
[[Knowledge]] is not the [[motivation]] for [[learning]] [[ACIM|this course]]. Peace is. This is the prerequisite for knowledge only because those who are in [[conflict]] are not peaceful, and peace is the condition of knowledge because it is the condition of [[Tk|the Kingdom]]. Knowledge can be restored only when you meet its conditions. This is not a [[bargain]] made by God, Who makes no bargains. It is merely the result of your misuse of [[Law of God|his laws]] on behalf of an imaginary will that is not his. Knowledge is his will. If you are opposing his will, how can you have knowledge? I have told you what knowledge offers you, but perhaps you do not yet regard this as wholly [[desirable]]. If you did you would not be so ready to throw it away when the [[ego]] asks for your [[allegiance]].
  
The distractions of the ego may seem to interfere with your learning, but the ego has no power to distract you unless you give it the power to do so. The ego's voice is an hallucination. You cannot expect it to say "I am not real." Yet you are not asked to dispel your hallucinations alone. You are merely asked to evaluate them in terms of their results to you. If you do not want them on the basis of loss of peace, they will be removed from your mind for you.
+
The [[distractions]] of the [[ego]] may seem to [[interfere]] with your [[learning]], but the ego has no [[power]] to distract you unless you give it the power to do so. The ego's [[voice]] is an [[hallucination]]. You cannot [[expect]] it to say "I am not real." Yet you are not asked to dispel your hallucinations [[alone]]. You are merely asked to [[evaluate]] them in terms of their results to you. If you do not want them on the basis of loss of peace, they will be removed from your [[mind]] for you.
  
Every response to the ego is a call to war, and war does deprive you of peace. Yet in this war there is no opponent. This is the reinterpretation of reality that you must make to secure peace, and the only one you need ever make. Those whom you perceive as opponents are part of your peace, which you are giving up by attacking them. How can you have what you give up? You share to have, but you do not give it up yourself. When you give up peace, you are excluding yourself from it. This is a condition so alien to the Kingdom that you cannot understand the state that prevails within it.
+
Every [[response]] to the [[ego]] is a call to [[war]], and war does deprive you of [[peace]]. Yet in this war there is no opponent. This is the reinterpretation of [[reality]] that you must make to secure peace, and the only one you need ever make. Those whom you [[perceive]] as opponents are part of your peace, which you are giving up by [[attacking]] them. How can you have what you give up? You [[share]] to have, but you do not give it up yourself. When you give up peace, you are excluding yourself from it. This is a condition so alien to [[Tk|the Kingdom]] that you cannot understand the state that prevails within it.
  
Your past learning must have taught you the wrong things, simply because it has not made you happy. On this basis alone its value should be questioned. If learning aims at change, and that is always its purpose, are you satisfied with the changes your learning has brought you? Dissatisfaction with learning outcomes is a sign of learning failure, since it means that you did not get what you wanted.
+
Your [[past]] learning must have taught you the wrong things, simply because it has not made you [[happy]]. On this basis [[alone]] its [[value]] should be questioned. If learning aims at [[change]], and that is always its [[purpose]], are you [[satisfied]] with the changes your learning has brought you? Dissatisfaction with learning outcomes is a sign of learning [[failure]], since it means that you did not get what you wanted.
  
The curriculum of the Atonement is the opposite of the curriculum you have established for yourself, but so is its outcome. If the outcome of yours has made you unhappy, and if you want a different one, a change in the curriculum is obviously necessary. The first change to be introduced is a change in direction. A meaningful curriculum cannot be inconsistent. If it is planned by two teachers, each believing in diametrically opposed ideas, it cannot be integrated. If it is carried out by these two teachers simultaneously, each one merely interferes with the other. This leads to fluctuation, but not to change. The volatile have no direction. They cannot choose one because they cannot relinquish the other, even if it does not exist. Their conflicted curriculum teaches them that all directions exist, and gives them no rationale for choice.
+
The [[curriculum]] of the [[Atonement]] is the opposite of the curriculum you have established for yourself, but so is its outcome. If the outcome of yours has made you unhappy, and if you want a [[different]] one, a [[change]] in the curriculum is obviously [[necessary]]. The first change to be introduced is a change in [[direction]]. A meaningful curriculum cannot be inconsistent. If it is planned by two [[teachers]], each believing in diametrically opposed ideas, it cannot be [[integrated]]. If it is carried out by these two teachers [[simultaneously]], each one merely interferes with the other. This leads to fluctuation, but not to change. The [[volatile]] have no direction. They cannot [[choose]] one because they cannot relinquish the other, even if it does not exist. Their [[conflicted]] curriculum teaches them that all directions exist, and gives them no [[rationale]] for choice.
  
The total senselessness of such a curriculum must be fully recognized before a real change in direction becomes possible. You cannot learn simultaneously from two teachers who are in total disagreement about everything. Their joint curriculum presents an impossible learning task. They are teaching you entirely different things in entirely different ways, which might be possible except that both are teaching you about yourself. Your reality is unaffected by both, but if you listen to both, your mind will be split about what your reality is.  
+
The total senselessness of such a curriculum must be fully recognized before a real [[change]] in [[direction]] becomes possible. You cannot learn [[simultaneously]] from two teachers who are in total disagreement about [[everything]]. Their joint curriculum presents an impossible [[learning]] task. They are teaching you entirely different things in entirely different ways, which might be possible except that both are teaching you about yourself. Your [[reality]] is unaffected by both, but if you [[listen]] to both, your [[mind]] will be split about what your reality is.  
  
  
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
[[Category: Chapter 8 - The Journey Back]]
 
[[Category: Chapter 8 - The Journey Back]]
 +
[[Category: Peace]]
 +
[[Category: Curriculum]]
 +
[[Category: Learning]]

Latest revision as of 21:18, 19 March 2015

Lighterstill.jpg

Acim small.jpg

Knowledge is not the motivation for learning this course. Peace is. This is the prerequisite for knowledge only because those who are in conflict are not peaceful, and peace is the condition of knowledge because it is the condition of the Kingdom. Knowledge can be restored only when you meet its conditions. This is not a bargain made by God, Who makes no bargains. It is merely the result of your misuse of his laws on behalf of an imaginary will that is not his. Knowledge is his will. If you are opposing his will, how can you have knowledge? I have told you what knowledge offers you, but perhaps you do not yet regard this as wholly desirable. If you did you would not be so ready to throw it away when the ego asks for your allegiance.

The distractions of the ego may seem to interfere with your learning, but the ego has no power to distract you unless you give it the power to do so. The ego's voice is an hallucination. You cannot expect it to say "I am not real." Yet you are not asked to dispel your hallucinations alone. You are merely asked to evaluate them in terms of their results to you. If you do not want them on the basis of loss of peace, they will be removed from your mind for you.

Every response to the ego is a call to war, and war does deprive you of peace. Yet in this war there is no opponent. This is the reinterpretation of reality that you must make to secure peace, and the only one you need ever make. Those whom you perceive as opponents are part of your peace, which you are giving up by attacking them. How can you have what you give up? You share to have, but you do not give it up yourself. When you give up peace, you are excluding yourself from it. This is a condition so alien to the Kingdom that you cannot understand the state that prevails within it.

Your past learning must have taught you the wrong things, simply because it has not made you happy. On this basis alone its value should be questioned. If learning aims at change, and that is always its purpose, are you satisfied with the changes your learning has brought you? Dissatisfaction with learning outcomes is a sign of learning failure, since it means that you did not get what you wanted.

The curriculum of the Atonement is the opposite of the curriculum you have established for yourself, but so is its outcome. If the outcome of yours has made you unhappy, and if you want a different one, a change in the curriculum is obviously necessary. The first change to be introduced is a change in direction. A meaningful curriculum cannot be inconsistent. If it is planned by two teachers, each believing in diametrically opposed ideas, it cannot be integrated. If it is carried out by these two teachers simultaneously, each one merely interferes with the other. This leads to fluctuation, but not to change. The volatile have no direction. They cannot choose one because they cannot relinquish the other, even if it does not exist. Their conflicted curriculum teaches them that all directions exist, and gives them no rationale for choice.

The total senselessness of such a curriculum must be fully recognized before a real change in direction becomes possible. You cannot learn simultaneously from two teachers who are in total disagreement about everything. Their joint curriculum presents an impossible learning task. They are teaching you entirely different things in entirely different ways, which might be possible except that both are teaching you about yourself. Your reality is unaffected by both, but if you listen to both, your mind will be split about what your reality is.