Difference between revisions of "Geo-engineering"
m (Text replacement - "http://nordan.daynal.org" to "https://nordan.daynal.org") |
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Geoengineering-experimentation200.jpg|right|frame]] | [[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Geoengineering-experimentation200.jpg|right|frame]] | ||
− | '''Geoengineering''' (also ''climate engineering'') is the deliberate and large-scale [[intervention]] in the Earth’s climatic system with the aim of reducing [ | + | '''Geoengineering''' (also ''climate engineering'') is the deliberate and large-scale [[intervention]] in the Earth’s climatic system with the aim of reducing [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming global warming]. The discipline divides broadly into two categories- [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_removal carbon dioxide removal] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation_management solar radiation management]. Carbon dioxide removal addresses a cause of climate change by removing one of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gases greenhouse gases] from the [[atmosphere]]. Solar radiation management attempts to offset effects of greenhouse gases by causing the [[Earth]] to absorb less [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation solar radiation]. |
− | The [ | + | The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergovernmental_Panel_on_Climate_Change Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] (IPCC) concluded in 2007 that geoengineering options remained largely unproven.[4] |
− | ''Geoengineering'' has been proposed as a [[potential]] third [[option]] for tackling global warming, alongside mitigation and adaptation. Scientists do not typically suggest geoengineering as an alternative to [ | + | ''Geoengineering'' has been proposed as a [[potential]] third [[option]] for tackling global warming, alongside mitigation and adaptation. Scientists do not typically suggest geoengineering as an alternative to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_pollution emissions control], but rather an accompanying strategy. Reviews of geoengineering techniques have emphasised that they are not substitutes for emission controls and have identified potentially stronger and weaker schemes. |
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Geo-engineering''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Geo-engineering '''''this link'''''].</center> | <center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Geo-engineering''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Geo-engineering '''''this link'''''].</center> | ||
− | There are no known large-scale geoengineering projects except one conducted outside the scientific [[mainstream]] by [ | + | There are no known large-scale geoengineering projects except one conducted outside the scientific [[mainstream]] by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russ_George Russ George]. Almost all [[research]] has consisted of [[computer modelling]] or [[laboratory]] tests, and attempts to move to real-world [[experimentation]] have proved [[controversial]]. Some limited tree planting and cool roof projects are already underway. Ocean [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_fertilization iron fertilization] has been given small-scale research trials. Field research into [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_sulphur_aerosols_(geoengineering) sulfur aerosols] has also started. |
− | Various criticisms have been made of geoengineering and some commentators appear fundamentally opposed. Some have suggested that the concept of geoengineering presents a [ | + | Various criticisms have been made of geoengineering and some commentators appear fundamentally opposed. Some have suggested that the concept of geoengineering presents a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_hazard moral hazard] because it could reduce the political and popular [[pressure]] for emissions reduction. Groups such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETC_Group ETC Group] and individuals such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Pierrehumbert Raymond Pierrehumbert] have called for a moratorium on deployment and out-of-doors testing of geoengineering techniques.[16][17] The full effects of various geoengineering schemes are not well understood.[unreliable source? |
− | Several notable [[organizations]] have investigated geoengineering with a view to evaluating its [[potential]], including the US Congress, NASA, the [ | + | Several notable [[organizations]] have investigated geoengineering with a view to evaluating its [[potential]], including the US Congress, NASA, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Society Royal Society], the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, and the UK Parliament, The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asilomar_International_Conference_on_Climate_Intervention_Technologies Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies] was convened to identify and develop risk reduction guidelines for climate intervention experimentation.[25] |
− | Major environmental organisations such as [ | + | Major environmental organisations such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends_of_the_Earth Friends of the Earth] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenpeace Greenpeace] have typically been reluctant to endorse solar radiation management, but are often more supportive of some carbon dioxide removal projects, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afforestation afforestation] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peatland_restoration peatland restoration]. Some authors have argued that any public support for geoengineering may weaken the fragile political consensus to reduce [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas greenhouse gas emissions]. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
− | *'''''[ | + | *'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrails Chemtrails]''''' |
[[Category: Earth Science]] | [[Category: Earth Science]] |
Latest revision as of 00:44, 13 December 2020
Geoengineering (also climate engineering) is the deliberate and large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climatic system with the aim of reducing global warming. The discipline divides broadly into two categories- carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation management. Carbon dioxide removal addresses a cause of climate change by removing one of the greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. Solar radiation management attempts to offset effects of greenhouse gases by causing the Earth to absorb less solar radiation.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded in 2007 that geoengineering options remained largely unproven.[4]
Geoengineering has been proposed as a potential third option for tackling global warming, alongside mitigation and adaptation. Scientists do not typically suggest geoengineering as an alternative to emissions control, but rather an accompanying strategy. Reviews of geoengineering techniques have emphasised that they are not substitutes for emission controls and have identified potentially stronger and weaker schemes.
There are no known large-scale geoengineering projects except one conducted outside the scientific mainstream by Russ George. Almost all research has consisted of computer modelling or laboratory tests, and attempts to move to real-world experimentation have proved controversial. Some limited tree planting and cool roof projects are already underway. Ocean iron fertilization has been given small-scale research trials. Field research into sulfur aerosols has also started.
Various criticisms have been made of geoengineering and some commentators appear fundamentally opposed. Some have suggested that the concept of geoengineering presents a moral hazard because it could reduce the political and popular pressure for emissions reduction. Groups such as ETC Group and individuals such as Raymond Pierrehumbert have called for a moratorium on deployment and out-of-doors testing of geoengineering techniques.[16][17] The full effects of various geoengineering schemes are not well understood.[unreliable source?
Several notable organizations have investigated geoengineering with a view to evaluating its potential, including the US Congress, NASA, the Royal Society, the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, and the UK Parliament, The Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies was convened to identify and develop risk reduction guidelines for climate intervention experimentation.[25]
Major environmental organisations such as Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace have typically been reluctant to endorse solar radiation management, but are often more supportive of some carbon dioxide removal projects, such as afforestation and peatland restoration. Some authors have argued that any public support for geoengineering may weaken the fragile political consensus to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.