Difference between revisions of "Compatible"
From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (Text replacement - "http://nordan.daynal.org" to "https://nordan.daynal.org") |
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Etymology== | ==Etymology== | ||
[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English], from Medieval Latin compatibilis, [[literally]], [[sympathetic]], from Late [[Latin]] compati | [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English], from Medieval Latin compatibilis, [[literally]], [[sympathetic]], from Late [[Latin]] compati | ||
| − | *Date: [ | + | *Date: [https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/15th_Century 15th century] |
==Definitions== | ==Definitions== | ||
*1 : capable of existing [[together]] in [[harmony]] <compatible [[theories]]> <compatible people> | *1 : capable of existing [[together]] in [[harmony]] <compatible [[theories]]> <compatible people> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Interpersonal '''compatibility''' is a [[concept]] that describes the long-term [[interaction]] between [[two]] or more [[individuals]] in terms of the ease and [[comfort]] of [[communication]]. | Interpersonal '''compatibility''' is a [[concept]] that describes the long-term [[interaction]] between [[two]] or more [[individuals]] in terms of the ease and [[comfort]] of [[communication]]. | ||
==Existing concepts== | ==Existing concepts== | ||
| − | Although various [[concepts]] of interpersonal compatibility have existed from ancient times (see e.g. Plato's [ | + | Although various [[concepts]] of interpersonal compatibility have existed from ancient times (see e.g. Plato's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysis_(dialogue) Lysis]), no general [[theory]] of interpersonal compatibility has been proposed in [[psychology]]. Existing concepts are [[contradictory]] in many details, beginning with the central point -- whether compatibility is caused by matching [[psychological]] [[parameters]] or by their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementarity complementarity]. At the same [[time]], the [[idea]] of interpersonal compatibility is [[analyzed]] in non-scientific fields (see e.g. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrological_compatibility Astrological compatibility]). |
Among existing [[psychological]] [[tools]] for [[studying]] and/or [[measuring]] interpersonal compatibility, the following are noteworthy: | Among existing [[psychological]] [[tools]] for [[studying]] and/or [[measuring]] interpersonal compatibility, the following are noteworthy: | ||
| − | * a test of interpersonal compatibility proposed by [ | + | * a test of interpersonal compatibility proposed by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Leary Timothy Leary] |
| − | * a three-factor [[hypothesis]] (inclusion, [[control]], and affection/openness) by [ | + | * a three-factor [[hypothesis]] (inclusion, [[control]], and affection/openness) by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Schutz William Schutz] (further [[developed]] into [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_Interpersonal_Relations_Orientation FIRO-B] questionnaire) |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Jurgen_Eysenck Hans Jurgen Eysenck]'s [[hypothesis]] on compatibility between [[temperaments]] |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_psychology_(psychology) Social psychological] [[research]] on similarity of interests and [[attitudes]] |
| − | * Compatibility test pamphlets of the 1930s and early computer dating of the 1950s, developed by [ | + | * Compatibility test pamphlets of the 1930s and early computer dating of the 1950s, developed by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Crane George W. Crane] |
| − | * [[hypothesis]] of compatibility between personality attitudes by [ | + | * [[hypothesis]] of compatibility between personality attitudes by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Ackoff Russell Ackoff] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Edmund_Emery Frederick Edmund Emery], |
* DMO tool by Lyudmila Sobchik (DMO stands for Interpersonal relations diagnostics, Russian: диагностика межличностных отношений) | * DMO tool by Lyudmila Sobchik (DMO stands for Interpersonal relations diagnostics, Russian: диагностика межличностных отношений) | ||
| − | [ | + | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socionics Socionics] has proposed a [[theory]] of intertype [[relationships]] between psychological types based on a modified version of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Gustav_Jung C.G. Jung]'s [[theory]] of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_types psychological types]. [[Communication]] between [[types]] is described using the [[concept]] of [[information]] [[metabolism]] proposed by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoni_K%C4%99pi%C5%84ski Antoni Kępiński]. However, socionic theory is somewhat [[controversial]] because of a lack of experimental data (although socionic data are much more representative than e.g. those of Ackoff and Emery). |
| − | [[Alternative]] [[hypotheses]] of intertype [[relationships]] were later proposed by adherents of [ | + | [[Alternative]] [[hypotheses]] of intertype [[relationships]] were later proposed by adherents of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBTI MBT]I ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Keirsey D. Keirsey]'s [[hypothesis]] of compatibility between [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keirsey_Temperament_Sorter Keirsey temperaments], an intertype relationships chart by Joe Butt and Marina Margaret Heiss, LoveTypes by Alexander Avila[4] and some other theories) Neither of these hypotheses is commonly accepted in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator Myers-Briggs type] theory. MBTI in Russia is often [[confused]] with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socionics socionics], although the 16 types in these theories are described [[differently]] and do not correlate exactly.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_compatibility] |
[[Category: Psychology]] | [[Category: Psychology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:41, 12 December 2020
Etymology
Middle English, from Medieval Latin compatibilis, literally, sympathetic, from Late Latin compati
- Date: 15th century
Definitions
- 1 : capable of existing together in harmony <compatible theories> <compatible people>
- 2 : capable of cross-fertilizing freely or uniting vegetatively
- 3 : capable of forming a homogeneous mixture that neither separates nor is altered by chemical interaction
- 4 : capable of being used in transfusion or grafting without immunological reaction (as agglutination or tissue rejection)
- 5 : designed to work with another device or system without modification; especially : being a computer designed to operate in the same manner and use the same software as another computer
Description
Interpersonal compatibility is a concept that describes the long-term interaction between two or more individuals in terms of the ease and comfort of communication.
Existing concepts
Although various concepts of interpersonal compatibility have existed from ancient times (see e.g. Plato's Lysis), no general theory of interpersonal compatibility has been proposed in psychology. Existing concepts are contradictory in many details, beginning with the central point -- whether compatibility is caused by matching psychological parameters or by their complementarity. At the same time, the idea of interpersonal compatibility is analyzed in non-scientific fields (see e.g. Astrological compatibility).
Among existing psychological tools for studying and/or measuring interpersonal compatibility, the following are noteworthy:
- a test of interpersonal compatibility proposed by Timothy Leary
- a three-factor hypothesis (inclusion, control, and affection/openness) by William Schutz (further developed into FIRO-B questionnaire)
- Hans Jurgen Eysenck's hypothesis on compatibility between temperaments
- Social psychological research on similarity of interests and attitudes
- Compatibility test pamphlets of the 1930s and early computer dating of the 1950s, developed by George W. Crane
- hypothesis of compatibility between personality attitudes by Russell Ackoff and Frederick Edmund Emery,
- DMO tool by Lyudmila Sobchik (DMO stands for Interpersonal relations diagnostics, Russian: диагностика межличностных отношений)
Socionics has proposed a theory of intertype relationships between psychological types based on a modified version of C.G. Jung's theory of psychological types. Communication between types is described using the concept of information metabolism proposed by Antoni Kępiński. However, socionic theory is somewhat controversial because of a lack of experimental data (although socionic data are much more representative than e.g. those of Ackoff and Emery).
Alternative hypotheses of intertype relationships were later proposed by adherents of MBTI (D. Keirsey's hypothesis of compatibility between Keirsey temperaments, an intertype relationships chart by Joe Butt and Marina Margaret Heiss, LoveTypes by Alexander Avila[4] and some other theories) Neither of these hypotheses is commonly accepted in the Myers-Briggs type theory. MBTI in Russia is often confused with socionics, although the 16 types in these theories are described differently and do not correlate exactly.[1]
