Difference between revisions of "Premises"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpgright|frame ==Origin== Anglo-Norman ''premisse'' , ''premesse'' and Middle French ''premisse'' (French ''prémisse'' ) (in [[...')
 
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
==Origin==
 
==Origin==
Anglo-Norman ''premisse'' , ''premesse'' and Middle French ''premisse'' (French ''prémisse'' ) (in [[Logic]]) each of the two [[propositions]] from which the [[conclusion]] is drawn in a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism syllogism]. Neuter plural of the past participle of classical [[Latin]] ''praemittere'' to put before.
+
Anglo-Norman ''premisse'' , ''premesse'' and Middle French ''premisse'' (French ''prémisse'' ) (in [[Logic]]) each of the two [[propositions]] from which the [[conclusion]] is drawn in a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism syllogism]. Neuter plural of the past participle of classical [[Latin]] ''praemittere'' to put before.
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_century 14th Century]
+
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_century 14th Century]
 
==Definitions==
 
==Definitions==
 
*1.a: a [[proposition]] antecedently [[supposed]] or [[proved]] as a basis of [[argument]] or [[inference]]; specifically : either of the first two propositions of a syllogism from which the [[conclusion]] is drawn  
 
*1.a: a [[proposition]] antecedently [[supposed]] or [[proved]] as a basis of [[argument]] or [[inference]]; specifically : either of the first two propositions of a syllogism from which the [[conclusion]] is drawn  
Line 10: Line 10:
 
*3: plural [from its being identified in the premises of the deed] a : a tract of [[land]] with the buildings thereon :b : a building or part of a building usually with its appurtenances (as grounds)  
 
*3: plural [from its being identified in the premises of the deed] a : a tract of [[land]] with the buildings thereon :b : a building or part of a building usually with its appurtenances (as grounds)  
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
A '''premise''' is a [[statement]] that an [[argument]] claims will induce or justify a [[conclusion]] (or an address). In other [[words]]: a premise is an [[assumption]] that something is true. In [[logic]], an [[argument]] requires a set of [[two]] declarative sentences (or "propositions") known as the ''premises'' along with another declarative sentence (or "proposition") known as the [[conclusion]]. This [[structure]] of two premises and one conclusion forms the basic [[argumentative]] [[structure]]. More [[complex]] [[arguments]] can utilize a series of rules to [[connect]] several premises to one [[conclusion]], or to derive a number of conclusions from the original premises which then act as premises for additional conclusions. An example of this is the use of the rules of [[inference]] found within [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_logic symbolic logic].
+
A '''premise''' is a [[statement]] that an [[argument]] claims will induce or justify a [[conclusion]] (or an address). In other [[words]]: a premise is an [[assumption]] that something is true. In [[logic]], an [[argument]] requires a set of [[two]] declarative sentences (or "propositions") known as the ''premises'' along with another declarative sentence (or "proposition") known as the [[conclusion]]. This [[structure]] of two premises and one conclusion forms the basic [[argumentative]] [[structure]]. More [[complex]] [[arguments]] can utilize a series of rules to [[connect]] several premises to one [[conclusion]], or to derive a number of conclusions from the original premises which then act as premises for additional conclusions. An example of this is the use of the rules of [[inference]] found within [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_logic symbolic logic].
  
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle Aristotle] held that any [[logical]] argument could be reduced to three premises and a [[conclusion]]. Premises are sometimes left unstated in which case they are called ''missing premises'', for example:
+
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle Aristotle] held that any [[logical]] argument could be reduced to three premises and a [[conclusion]]. Premises are sometimes left unstated in which case they are called ''missing premises'', for example:
  
 
::[[Socrates]] is [[mortal]], since all men are mortal.
 
::[[Socrates]] is [[mortal]], since all men are mortal.

Latest revision as of 02:32, 13 December 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

False-premise.jpg

Origin

Anglo-Norman premisse , premesse and Middle French premisse (French prémisse ) (in Logic) each of the two propositions from which the conclusion is drawn in a syllogism. Neuter plural of the past participle of classical Latin praemittere to put before.

Definitions

b : something assumed or taken for granted : presupposition
  • 2: plural : matters previously stated; specifically : the preliminary and explanatory part of a deed or of a bill in equity
  • 3: plural [from its being identified in the premises of the deed] a : a tract of land with the buildings thereon :b : a building or part of a building usually with its appurtenances (as grounds)

Description

A premise is a statement that an argument claims will induce or justify a conclusion (or an address). In other words: a premise is an assumption that something is true. In logic, an argument requires a set of two declarative sentences (or "propositions") known as the premises along with another declarative sentence (or "proposition") known as the conclusion. This structure of two premises and one conclusion forms the basic argumentative structure. More complex arguments can utilize a series of rules to connect several premises to one conclusion, or to derive a number of conclusions from the original premises which then act as premises for additional conclusions. An example of this is the use of the rules of inference found within symbolic logic.

Aristotle held that any logical argument could be reduced to three premises and a conclusion. Premises are sometimes left unstated in which case they are called missing premises, for example:

Socrates is mortal, since all men are mortal.

It is evident that a tacitly understood claim is that Socrates is a man. The fully expressed reasoning is thus:

Since all men are mortal and Socrates is a man, Socrates is mortal.

In this example, the first two independent clauses preceding the comma (namely, "all men are mortal" and "Socrates is a man") are the premises, while "Socrates is mortal" is the conclusion.

The proof of a conclusion depends on both the truth of the premises and the validity of the argument.