Difference between revisions of "Vulgar"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "http://nordan.daynal.org" to "https://nordan.daynal.org")
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Etymology==
 
==Etymology==
 
[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English], from [[Latin]] vulgaris of the mob, vulgar, from volgus, vulgus mob, common people
 
[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English], from [[Latin]] vulgaris of the mob, vulgar, from volgus, vulgus mob, common people
*Date: [http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_Century 14th century]
+
*Date: [https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_Century 14th century]
 
==Definitions==
 
==Definitions==
 
*1 a : generally used, applied, or accepted  
 
*1 a : generally used, applied, or accepted  
Line 17: Line 17:
 
:b : lewdly or profanely indecent
 
:b : lewdly or profanely indecent
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
A '''vulgarism''' (from Latin vulgus, the "mean folk"), also called scurrility, is a colloquialism of a low or unrefined [[character]], which substitutes a coarse, indecorous [[word]] where the context might lead the [[reader]] to expect a more refined [[expression]]. For example the term "the tits on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botticelli Botticelli]'s [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birth_of_Venus_(Botticelli) Venus]" is a vulgarism. Vulgarisms are [[assumed]] to be [[associated]] with low and coarse [[motivations]] that were [[stereotypically]] supposed to be [[naturally]] endemic to the 'meaner classes', who were not moved by 'higher' motives like fame for posterity and [[honor]] among [[peers]]—motives that were alleged to move the literate classes. Thus the [[concept]] of vulgarism carries cultural freight from the outset, and from some [[social]] and [[religious]] [[perspectives]] it does not genuinely exist, or—and perhaps this amounts to the same thing—ought not to exist.
+
A '''vulgarism''' (from Latin vulgus, the "mean folk"), also called scurrility, is a colloquialism of a low or unrefined [[character]], which substitutes a coarse, indecorous [[word]] where the context might lead the [[reader]] to expect a more refined [[expression]]. For example the term "the tits on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botticelli Botticelli]'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birth_of_Venus_(Botticelli) Venus]" is a vulgarism. Vulgarisms are [[assumed]] to be [[associated]] with low and coarse [[motivations]] that were [[stereotypically]] supposed to be [[naturally]] endemic to the 'meaner classes', who were not moved by 'higher' motives like fame for posterity and [[honor]] among [[peers]]—motives that were alleged to move the literate classes. Thus the [[concept]] of vulgarism carries cultural freight from the outset, and from some [[social]] and [[religious]] [[perspectives]] it does not genuinely exist, or—and perhaps this amounts to the same thing—ought not to exist.
  
More broadly, vulgarity generally has a [[social]] and [[moral]] component. Whether [[deliberate]] or [[accidental]], the substitution of a commonplace word that is not a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphemism euphemism] draws [[attention]] to what may be a speaker's high-[[tone]]d [[moral]] superiority or sophistication but a fatal flaw in the usage often reveals that the speaker's [[ambitions]] are not based in [[reality]]. Vulgarisms therefore highlight the pretentious, showing people that lay unwarranted claim to social [[graces]] and [[education]] and attempt to inflate their [[status]] through the use of [[language]] they either cannot [[control]] or do not [[understand]].
+
More broadly, vulgarity generally has a [[social]] and [[moral]] component. Whether [[deliberate]] or [[accidental]], the substitution of a commonplace word that is not a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphemism euphemism] draws [[attention]] to what may be a speaker's high-[[tone]]d [[moral]] superiority or sophistication but a fatal flaw in the usage often reveals that the speaker's [[ambitions]] are not based in [[reality]]. Vulgarisms therefore highlight the pretentious, showing people that lay unwarranted claim to social [[graces]] and [[education]] and attempt to inflate their [[status]] through the use of [[language]] they either cannot [[control]] or do not [[understand]].
  
 
[[Category: Languages and Literature]]
 
[[Category: Languages and Literature]]

Latest revision as of 02:42, 13 December 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

Vulgar.jpg

Etymology

Middle English, from Latin vulgaris of the mob, vulgar, from volgus, vulgus mob, common people

Definitions

  • 1 a : generally used, applied, or accepted
b : understood in or having the ordinary sense <they reject the vulgar conception of miracle — W. R. Inge>
  • 2 : vernacular <the vulgar name of a plant>
  • 3 a : of or relating to the common people : plebeian
b : generally current : public <the vulgar opinion of that time>
c : of the usual, typical, or ordinary kind
  • 4 a : lacking in cultivation, perception, or taste : coarse
b : morally crude, undeveloped, or unregenerate : gross
c : ostentatious or excessive in expenditure or display : pretentious
b : lewdly or profanely indecent

Description

A vulgarism (from Latin vulgus, the "mean folk"), also called scurrility, is a colloquialism of a low or unrefined character, which substitutes a coarse, indecorous word where the context might lead the reader to expect a more refined expression. For example the term "the tits on Botticelli's Venus" is a vulgarism. Vulgarisms are assumed to be associated with low and coarse motivations that were stereotypically supposed to be naturally endemic to the 'meaner classes', who were not moved by 'higher' motives like fame for posterity and honor among peers—motives that were alleged to move the literate classes. Thus the concept of vulgarism carries cultural freight from the outset, and from some social and religious perspectives it does not genuinely exist, or—and perhaps this amounts to the same thing—ought not to exist.

More broadly, vulgarity generally has a social and moral component. Whether deliberate or accidental, the substitution of a commonplace word that is not a euphemism draws attention to what may be a speaker's high-toned moral superiority or sophistication but a fatal flaw in the usage often reveals that the speaker's ambitions are not based in reality. Vulgarisms therefore highlight the pretentious, showing people that lay unwarranted claim to social graces and education and attempt to inflate their status through the use of language they either cannot control or do not understand.