Search results

...fact be wrong, and is therefore to be questioned and improved) stems from Popper's philosophy. In an interview with 60 Minutes, Soros identified himself as With Mark Amadeus Notturno, Science and the Open Society: The Future of Karl Popper's Philosophy (Central European University Press, 2000) ISBN 963-9116-69-6 (

*[[Karl R. Popper]], ''On the Sources of Knowledge and of Ignorance'' (1960)

*Popper, Karl. R.. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press

...l examination of various positions on this issue can be found in [[Karl R. Popper]]'s ''The Poverty of Historicism''.</ref> Discussion and debate abound in t *** [[Karl Popper]]

...l examination of various positions on this issue can be found in [[Karl R. Popper]]'s ''The Poverty of Historicism''.</ref> Discussion and debate abound in t *** [[Karl Popper]]

[[Karl Popper]], following others, developing and inverting the views of the Austrian [[l [[Karl Popper]] (1902–1994), beginning in the 1930s and with increased vigor after Worl

...nalysis in general. Other commentators, such as Edward Timms, author of <i>Karl Kraus - Apocalyptic Satirist</i>, have argued that Kraus respected Freud, t ...heory of the unconscious was not falsifiable and therefore not scientific. Popper did not object to the idea that some mental processes could be unconscious

A. B. Hill built upon the work of [[David Hume]] and [[Karl Popper]] and suggested that the following aspects of an association be considered